I don't normally spend my time reading lifelike stories, so John
Green books are something new to me. Most of the time, I prefer to
read about magic and aliens rather than regular kids in high school,
and I actively avoid novels that portray ordinary life. However, I've
been hearing glowing recommendations for John Green for quite a while
now, so when Michelle asked me to read one of his books, I quickly
accepted. That night, I curled up with a copy of Will Grayson, Will Grayson.
I was a bit surprised by the book and the way it was written. The
story follows the points of view of two different boys, both named
Will Grayson, and the events that lead up to their meeting point as
well as the repercussions that follow. Each chapter alternates
between their narration. The first Will Grayson seems to be a
decently normal, shy kid, and the oddest thing about him is his best
friend. Will Grayson #1 is best friends with a flamboyantly
homosexual boy named Tiny, ironically nicknamed for his very large
size. Will Grayson #2 seems depressed and angry, and he's harboring a
deep secret that he hasn't yet shared with the world. The writing of
his point of view differs from Will Grayson #1 because it doesn't use
any capital letters and often leaves out punctuation as well
(something which annoyed the Grammarian in me at first but which was
surprisingly easy to get used to).
The oddest thing about this book, to me, was that the main story
wasn't even about either of the Will Graysons. The actual plot
revolved around Will #1's best friend, Tiny Cooper. The Will Graysons
were just the vehicles for Tiny's story to be told. They were almost
minor characters, in their own way, and their own personal journeys
only seemed important because of how they affected Tiny. It was an
interesting way to read a story.
John Green and his contributor, David Levithan, did an excellent
job on characterization. The characters are normal, flawed people
just like anyone you'd meet on the street. They have doubts, fears,
and awkward moments, and they make mistakes just like the rest of us.
At the same time, their ordinariness does not make the story
uninteresting. Contrariwise, the story is interesting in part because
they are ordinary. The characters embody the traits of the kind of
people that everyone knows. Everybody knows someone who is always at
the center of attention. Everyone knows a shy kid. Everyone knows the
guy who treats everyone else with contempt. We all have that friend
who we love even though they frequently embarrass us in public. The
story is an easy one to like because there's something for everyone
to identify with. It's also a rather emotional read because the
realness of the characters makes them easy to care about.
I think Will Grayson, Will Grayson was a good start for me on John
Green. I'll definitely be picking up his other books in the near
future. I recommend you do the same.
We Have Moved!
We have moved our blog to the new CHB website! Check us out over there to find our latest stories and reviews!
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Review: An Object of Beauty by Steve Martin
After reading and loving Steve Martin’s Shopgirl, I decided to keep up
with his novels, so it was with great excitement that I finally picked up An Object of Beauty. It becomes clear almost immediately that this is going to be
a very different novel. The main character, Lacey Yeager, is basically a
predator. She lacks the soft, shy, loneliness of Martin’s previous characters
(though the narrator, who we learn very little about, has it in spades). The
predatory Lacey begins the novel as a recent college graduate looking to make
her place in the art world of New
York through whatever means necessary. Now, if this
were merely the story of a beautiful young social climber it would hold no
interest for me, but it is so much more than that.
Essentially, An Object of Beauty is the story of the New York art scene over the past twenty
years. Steve Martin uses Lacey and her story to tell that much broader history;
from the rise in popularity (and price) of modern artworks in the mid 90s to
the economic collapse of 2008 and the subsequent collapse of the art market,
the book was a fascinating look into a world I knew nothing about. Martin
described the fluctuations of the market in terms that I could understand, as
he did when describing the rise in prices of contemporary works following Andy
Warhol’s steady rise in price:
“When Warhol started to achieve newsworthy prices, the value of
contemporary art, including art that was yet to be created, was pushed up from
behind. Warhol’s presence was so vivid, so recent, that he was identified not
with the dead, but as the first nugget from Sutter’s Mill. The rush was on.”
The feeling of being in on this art world esoterica was good enough, but
Martin combined it with an interesting, if immoral, character in Lacey. The
novel also holds an element of mystery, as very early on the reader is made
aware that Lacey has done something that was not exactly on the level. This is
entirely true to her character, but what exactly she has done goes unexplained
until the end when it comes to light as the art market crashes in on itself.
Steve Martin has written a very good novel with a slow, natural tone that
will be familiar to the fans of his other books even if the significantly less
endearing characters are not. The book itself is beautiful, as it contains
illustrations of various works of art alongside the discussions about them in
the text.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Review: The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky
Stephen
Chbosky's The Perks of Being a Wallflower made high school a little
easier for me. It was something that I could point to that said I was
not alone. A touchstone of the awkward loneliness of the lost and
confused. And I was afraid to reread it. It had been something
greater than ten years since I read and loved Perks, what if I had
changed while the novel had not? Books have great power and I was
afraid that this one would lose its place for me as an adult reader.
It
didn't.
The
Perks of Being a Wallflower is the story of Charlie, who is slowly
learning to be an active participant in life. Charlie begins his
first year of high school scared and alone. To cope, he writes
letters to a stranger. This is someone he's been told will listen and
understand. Someone Charlie can trust because they “didn't try to
sleep with that person at that party even though (they) could have.”
The format of the novel in letters so suits this books as it affords
an intimacy that would have been lacking from a more straight forward
telling.
Charlie's
letters, addressed simply to “friend,” follow him through his
freshman year. From the lonely first day, to his first party, first
kiss, all of the wonderful lessons learned from books, teachers, and
new friends, and finally to the end of year departure of those who
are graduating and moving on. The book is about learning to navigate
the complex relationships that come postchildhood, especially a
childhood that ends as abruptly as Charlie's.
Charlie has been stuck between the
innocence of childhood and the harsh realities of the adult world for
most of his life. He was forced into situations he was not yet
capable of understanding which led to a series of mental breaks. This
instability is what led Charlie to his life as a wallflower; he was
too trapped in his own mind to participate in life. The Perks of
Being a Wallflower is the narration of his breaking free of that
incapacity through friendship and books and music all leading up to
actions. Because actions can make life feel infinite.
I identified completely with this novel
as a young adult, my review may be biased, but I think that The Perks
of Being a Wallflower is an important book. I feel that it is too
cliché to refer to something as “the new” anything, but if it
must be said then Perks is the new Catcher in the Rye. It is a novel that
gives friends to the friendless and a place to go for anyone who
doesn't understand or isn't understood.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Review: Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy
Is it fair to call any novel the
“Greatest Novel Ever Written” - it does not seem to be so, but I
can't help it. Anna Karenina is quite simply the greatest novel ever
written and not just the best novel I've read. I cannot imagine any
other novel matching this one as it possesses everything one wants
from a novel – it is gripping, philosophical, enthralling, long,
and utterly timeless. Long seems to be strange praise but I use it to
say that I would have stayed with Tolstoy for as many pages as he
needed to tell his story.
What struck me most about this 100+
year old novel was how timeless it is. When an author like Tolstoy
sets out to tell a human story the setting is almost irrelevant
because what makes us human is universal. The love, betrayal, and
fear described are all never changing, it is our emotions that make
us human, so that was not surprising but even on the philosophical
level things are the same. We are having the same debates about
social order, education, gender, and relationships that we were
having all those years ago. However, to say that setting is
irrelevant is maybe a bit flip because another element of the novel
that amazed me was how clearly defined the social conventions were.
Tolstoy made me feel late 19th century Russia. I felt that
I could really see into this hidden world; it was so fully realized
that I was immersed within it.
To get into a discussion about the
characters makes me feel as though this is more of a book report than
a review of my impressions because there are so many characters and
they are all so connected no matter how tenuously. I guess this is
because I feel that the novel is bigger than the sum of its parts. No
amount of discussion of the romance between Anna and Vronsky or the
moralizing of Karenin to Anna or even the subtle awesomeness of Levin
will lead you to read this book and it will only serve to spoil you
of the virgin delights I experienced upon first encountering the
novel. With a novel as “Important” as Anna Karenina I find it
best to go in blind, work my way out of the material, wrestle with
themes, and then surrender to academia. Upon the completion of a
great novel I like to do a little research, discovering all the
things I missed within the novel and praising myself over all that I
did observe.
The characters within Anna Karenina are
both real and not. They are real in that they are full of
selfishness, beauty, and contradiction just like the rest of us, yet
they stand apart in that they are the vehicles of Tolstoy's ideas.
They are there to represent both what is and what is not possible,
and the ultimate goal of the tragedy is to expose an unyielding
society whose fear of change and difference, seen as depravity, may
sink not only one person but a nation. The novel definitely speaks to
the changing society in Russia that came to fruition in the years
after the novel was published.
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Review: Life of Pi by Yann Martel
Life of Pi is the story of a boy trapped on a life boat with a Bengal
tiger, but of course (as with every simple summary) there is so much
more than that. Pi is about religion, storytelling, and understanding
oneself. The highest compliment I can pay this novel is that it
reminded me of Slaughterhouse Five. In the way that the earlier novel
is about WWII and aliens, Life of Pi is about life and tigers, with
all the same leanings toward PTSD.
The
novel begins in India, where we learn that Pi Patel is a Hindu, a
Christian, and a Muslim. Basically, Pi is a searcher finding meaning
where he needs it. The novel is so chock full of symbolism that
immediately upon finishing it I wished to go back to the beginning in
order to see what would be revealed. Pi's religious leanings and
pliant character detailed in the beginning of the story will color
the rest of the novel. Once the inevitable shipwreck occurs and he is
alone with the animals on the raft it is his adaptable nature that
saves him.
Life
of Pi is ostensibly a novel that can make someone believe in God. We
are introduced to that concept of the story's function in the
beginning. But it is not a God that can be named or found easily.
Mantel and his characters are interested in a God that is beyond
tradition. The young writer transcribing Pi's tale finds God through
story, Pi himself found God through curiosity, and the reader is
expected to encounter God through the novel in any way they choose –
everything is left open to interpretation. With that, I feel it is
important to note that Life of Pi is not a religious novel nor even a
spiritual one. The idea of God to Mantel seems, to me at least, to be
whatever you want it to be. God is what is holy to you, if that is a
God of a religious nature then so be it but if it is not then Mantel
allows for that as well. This openness is the beauty of Life of Pi.
When
I wrote about The Things They Carried, one of the big ideas I was
interested in was O'Brien's distinction between story truth and
happening truth. Well, Yann Martel took that idea and threw a tiger
at it. And it was awesome. I have never read a book quite like Life
of Pi and I doubt I will ever read another. Martel works a sort of
literary magic with this novel transforming not only the novel but
life itself from everything it is to everything it can be.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Review: Diary of a Wimpy Kid by Jeff Kinney
Jeff Kinney's Diary of a Wimpy Kid
series about the life and times of Greg Heffley is an international
bestseller. Seriously, these books have sold millions of copies and
if you are not familiar with them ask any kid you know and I
guarantee they will be able to clue you in. The publication of the
newest Wimpy Kid book has gotten me curious about this entire
phenomenon. Curious enough to go back to the first book in the series
and see just what it is all about.
The seminal book the Wimpy Kid series
titled Diary of a Wimpy Kid is the introduction into Greg's
world. It is immediately clear to the adult reader just what it is
that resonates with kids, Greg's world is our world thus their world.
It's full of awkwardness with girls, homework, chores, and parents
who just don't understand. My sister and I recently had a
conversation about middle school and her claim that the middle school
years are even more horrifying and cringe worthy than the high
schools years really struck me. Middle school is a weird time. You've
got sixth graders mingling with eighth graders and between those two
is the onset of puberty. It's a veritable breeding ground for
awkwardness, misunderstanding, and bullies.
Diary of a Wimpy Kid definitely
gets the first two right. Greg is awkward, he thinks he knows much
more than he does, and he has trouble relating to those around him
because he is so wrapped up in himself. The honesty of Kinney's book
might just be what I didn't like about it. Greg is described as being
a real kid to the T and that includes all of the selfishness of kids
at this difficult age. Greg writes in his diary about the bullies at
school and how everyone else gets it wrong all the while the reader
(at least the adult reader) perceives him as the biggest bully in the
story.
The Wimpy Kid series and its popularity
certainly aren't an anomaly. Kids latch on to certain characters for
any number of reasons and Jeff Kinney's books are the most recent to
really hit home. The fact that they are not really my cup of tea
(judging by the first book at least) stems solely from the fact that
I did not like Greg. It may be a tad too idealistic of me but I like
the kids in children's literature to be role models. Flaws are
necessary to building a realistic character, but I see little value
in a character like Greg who has little to no redeeming qualities.
Diary of a Wimpy Kid was a cute
book and the honesty about how kids navigate this difficult age is an
obvious appeal; it just isn't for me.
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Review: Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell
It's time to talk about Cloud Atlas,
which I have been putting off not for lack of something to say but
because I want to say everything. The first thing I've got to tell
you is that this novel is staggeringly ambitious. Essentially what
David Mitchell has done is written six novellas that work together as
variations upon a theme but also tell a greater story. What is most
impressive about Cloud Atlas is not the story or the message or the
themes but the writing, the language, and the technical skill.
Mitchell's craft is so finely honed that he has conquered the voice
of not only his characters, but six entirely different authors. Each
story nestled within the sextet could be the work of a different
writer, yet they are all sprung from the same pen, same mind.
But that's enough gushing about the
bones, you're curious about the meat, right? Cloud Atlas begins and
ends in the eighteenth century but along the way it traverses the
near and distant past and future from seafaring Adam Ewing to
intrepid reporter Luisa Rey to clone/model/servant/rebel Sonmi-451.
There is something here for everyone and quite a lot for anyone to
digest. I know it seems unfair to say this, but I do not want to tell
you what Cloud Atlas is about in the sense of the plot. I could hash
it out for you, but that's not really what the novel is about anyway
and it would take away from your own discoveries.
Instead, I'd rather talk about what the
novel is actually about in a “what it all means” sense or at
least what it means to me. Cloud Atlas is about freedom and slavery
in all of their mental, physical, and spiritual forms. It's about
connectivity between people and time and history and stories. It's
about the pain we can cause and the healing we can affect. It is
about humanity and everything good, bad, and downright scary that it
entails. Essentially, what I am saying is that this book is about, in
the words of Douglas Adams, life, the universe, and everything.
There are things that I did not love
about Cloud Atlas (in particular, the ending is heavy handed and
overblown in regards to Mitchell's message). And while I may have
enjoyed the construction even more than the stories, because puzzling
through the text and finding the connections was such a joy, the
themes will stick with me. Mitchell's novel has given me pause to
think about the way I perceive my fellow humans in all of their
forms, colors, shapes, and sizes. Cloud Atlas is worth reading for
Mitchell's ambition and technical skill alone, but those aspects
coupled with the warning of our penchant toward evils and praise of
our capacities toward good make for an enthralling experience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






